Is There A Link Between The J&J Vaccine And Hepatitis?
The Hidden Reason The FDA May Be Putting Strict Limits on The J&J Vaccine
For those following this Substack, the fact that the FDA put strict limits on the Johnson & Johnson vaccine should come as no surprise. NONE OF THESE COVID VACCINES ARE SAFE. NONE!
I’ve been saying this for quite some time. The stated reason for limiting J&J to those above eighteen as well as to those for whom another vaccine isn’t appropriate is the risk of “a rare and dangerous clotting condition called thrombosis with thrombocytopenia syndrome (TTS).”
If you’ll excuse my language, this is BULLSH*T. The risk of these clotting conditions has been known for over a year and, at least so far as I can tell, this risk is no greater with the MRNA options (Pfizer, Moderna etc.). Review the VAERS Data here for more info, but, to summarize, these clotting conditions are but one of numerous problems that have been linked to these products as evidenced by VAERS data, DOD data, the Thomas Renz lawsuit, Edward Dowd data, as well as analysis done by numerous experts like Dr. Jessica Rose and Steve Kirsch.
So what is really going on? Some have suggested that the hepatitis outbreak in children is caused by the J&J vaccine. Over 109 children are having issues in 25 states. A number of them need liver transplants. Others perish. The problem seems to be global; in the U.K. there are over 114 cases.
Of course, like clockwork, the fact checkers are struggling to disprove there could possibly be a link between this troubling outbreak and the J&J covid vaccine. But are the so-called experts correct? After all, it’s VERY INTERESTING that they specifically restricted the J&J covid vaccine for those under 18 WHEN THAT IS THE EXACT POPULATION, CHILDREN, GETTING HIT BY HEPATITIS.
It is also VERY INTERESTING that these same fact-checkers ARE ABSOLUTELY POSITIVE THE PROBLEM CANNOT BE COMING FROM THE VACCINES. How can they be sure? After all there is some scientific evidence that suggests the opposite: a link between covid vaccination and hepatitis.
For instance, a paper in The Journal of Autoimmunity, Vol 123 titled “Autoimmune hepatitis triggered by SARS-COV-2 vaccination,” discusses the case of a woman who developed “severe autoimmune hepatitis following SARS-COV-2 vaccination.” The article also points out this case had a tight temporal relationship between vaccination and development of hepatitis and identifies a potential mechanism “an aberrant immune response triggered by molecular mimicry and bystander activation.”
That’s not all. An article in “Journal of Hepatology” highlights a separate case of severe hepatitis following a covid vaccine. This fit the same pattern; short interval between vaccination and symptoms; similar histological appearances; no confounding risk factors etc. The articles also mention other cases that seem to be happening and again seems to suggest a causal link.
Finally, an article on MRNA vaccines in “Current Issues in Molecular Biology” points out that vaccine cells can enter liver cells. Yes, this article covers MRNA jabs and the covid is a viral vector vaccine. Still, according to Dr. Malone, these vaccines are all “gene therapy,” making J&J not necessarily all that different from the others.
Hence, it seems plausible that the J&J vaccine could circulate in the body, get taken up by the liver, where, in attempting to detoxify, it gets injured, causing hepatitis.
While I’m not stating conclusively these vaccines caused the hepatitis outbreak, as I’m not qualified to make this judgment, I will say something IS HIGHLY SUSPICIOUS. Even the way the articles discuss the hepatitis outbreak feels unnerving. “CDC Looks For Cause Of Mysterious Hepatitis In Children” one states. “Hepatitis In Children Mystery Still Unsolved” cites another. These articles make it sound like this is a case for Sherlock Holmes.
Of course, at no point in these articles do they reference the scientific research demonstrating the material inside the covid vaccines circulate throughout the body and end up in the liver. Nor do they discuss the cases in the scientific literature of severe hepatitis immediately following SARS COV-2 vaccination. It’s just some weird, random coincidence!
Give the history of shenanigans we’ve seen these past two years, the lies, the manipulated data, the pushing of drugs that are inffective and the suppression of therapies that work, the FDA may very well be trying to distract the public with a red herring, blood clots, that are hardly a new development.
This distraction would enable them to severely restrict the J&J vaccine without facing the same level of scrutiny. It might also reduce legal liability, improves mass compliance, and, above all, make its big pharma partners happy. Again, I can’t prove any of this, but, to my mind at least, as Marcellus put it in Macbeth, “something is rotten in the state of Denmark.”
Shot 0 is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
If you enjoyed Shot O, you might like my humor book, “Do Not Feed The Clown.